The punchline of this Polish meme is hilarious, but the setup is tragedy

So listen, I know jokes aren’t funny anymore once you have to explain them, but bear with me, because this meme is fucking hilarious:


If you haven’t been following what’s happening in Poland, there’s a lot to explain:

1. Smolensk, the plane crash

In 2010, a small plane carrying then President of Poland, Lech Kaczyński, his wife, and many high ranking government officials, among others (Wikipedia link) crashed on the way to a memorial ceremony in Russia.

Investigations by both the Polish and Russian governments established that it was an accident caused primarily by bad weather, among other factors.

The details at this point are immaterial — what’s important is what happened next. A lot of people in Poland were convinced that the crash was not an accident, that it was actually a plot by the Russians to take down the Polish government.

The President’s twin brother, Jarosław Kaczyński, became the most visible supporter of the notion that the crash at Smolensk was an attack, not an accident. He later became the leader of a new right-wing populist movement in Poland.

There’s a great This American Life episode about the political turmoil this caused in Poland if you want to know more.

2. Danuta Holecka

Fast forward to 2015 — the Law and Justice party, led by Kaczyński, first won the presidency, and then won an absolute majority in the parliament, the first time this has happened in Poland’s history.

One of their first acts in government was replacing everyone in the state-run media with people on their side.


Danuta Holecka is one of the most visible faces of this new order, as the newly-installed anchor of the regular nightly prime-time newscast.

These days, according to my friends who live in Poland, these newscasts are a reliable source of Catholic Church propaganda, anti-European Union agitation, and revisionist history lessons. And when I was watching the news with my friend recently, I also saw an advertisement for…

3. Smolensk, the movie

Another act of the new government was to subsidize the production of a feature-length film about the plane crash, called “Smolensk”, which presents a, uh, “fictionalized” account of the conspiracy-theory version of the plane crash, where the whole thing is a Russian plot. Notable facts about the movie are its 1.1 rating on IMDB, and the fictionalized murder of an actual television reporter by Russian spies, who I’m told is not happy about being portrayed (or murdered) in the movie.

The actual posters for this movie feature the seal of the President as an “honorary patron”:


4. Polish abortion laws and #czarnyprotest

The new right-wing dominated Polish parliament, which proudly takes political advice from the country’s Catholic bishops, recently considered a citizen’s initiative which would have completely banned and criminalized abortion. This inspired massive protests all over the country in which women wore all black (“czarny”), and culminated in a massive one-day strike where women didn’t go to work or work around the house, and instead took the streets.

30,000 women (and allies) gathered in Warsaw alone on Monday. Here’s a photo:


(photo: Reuters)

The news that night was filled with assertions that the protesters were not there because of abortion rights, but because the opposition political party was trying to use the issue for their advantage, and insinuations that people had been bused in, or were “out of town agitators”, etc etc. If you’re in the U.S. you’ve seen this movie before.

So some genius made this the next day:



Hilarious, right?

So this is the point: Poland is literally living through the dystopia depicted in V For VendettaBut they’re really good at making jokes about it.

And in this case, they won — the Polish anti-abortion bill was defeated today.

Race For The Prize

Let’s take a moment to set aside the inevitable complication of this news by capitalism, and allow ourselves a moment of unalloyed optimism:

As fears over the Zika virus mount worldwide, scientists have created two vaccine candidates that protected mice from the virus. A single shot of each led to complete protection against Zika, according to a study published Tuesday in the journal Nature. While there are still questions to answer and more trials to conduct, this is the first vaccine candidate for Zika and could bring some respite for the millions of people expected to contract the virus in the upcoming months.

“Breakthrough Vaccine Made Mice Immune To Zika”, Vocativ

“Be Reasonable”

A few months ago, I joined a bunch of friends to blockade the road leading to the hotel where the California GOP convention took place.  We forced Donald Trump to jump the fence next to the highway and hike through the weeds to make his speech. As we sat there hour after hour in the hot sun, our arms chained together, with people occasionally coming by to feed us sips of water and snacks, I saw a lot of often very well-dressed people with Hillary Clinton campaign signs walking to the rally like it was a picnic.

I heard from these people, more than once, about how unseemly they felt the blockade was. How such an unruly approach made us “no better than them“. I listened to them chiding the Latino teenagers throwing eggs at the convention attendants and flipping off the cops, making hoary common-wisdom kinds of observations like “well gee, look, there’s just so much hate on both sides! That’s the problem right there!”

Now that Clinton is the nominee, I have a bad feeling I’m going to hear a lot more of this kind of thing. I’m going to hear about how Clinton’s long march through the institutions, her calculated positions on controversial issues that “evolve” just when it’s most politically convenient, and her backwards approach to negotiating, where you admit defeat and concede everything before you even get to the table, is the “right” way to do politics.

I heard that kind of sentiment on NPR last night, when a reporter characterized Sanders’ appeal to young people as a “74-year-old man saying ‘I understand your anger! I’ve always felt the way I felt at 21!'”, implying that Sanders’ supporters (or even Sanders himself) is simply just immature, instead of having any legitimate ideas.

The idea that political institutions and the democratic process are the thing that creates change is profoundly ahistorical. The democratic process is frequently a roadblock to collective liberation. Abolition, women’s suffrage, the end of legal segregation, and legal gay marriage were all accomplished in spite of democracy. To this day, if some of these things went to a vote, we would end up less free.

So this is partly an admission that Bernie Sanders would not have been able to do most of the things he said he was going to do, and that change was never going to come through the ballot box. But what has been a defining aspect of his career, what I felt was the point of his candidacy, and why I supported it, was that he understood that political will is created by making a clear demand, and being totally unreasonable until the people in power catch up.

We’re going to hear a lot about how Clinton’s proposals are more “realistic” because they’re achievable within the boundaries of our political system. But none of them are going to be enacted. If she becomes president, we are, at best, going to get the worst pieces of them in exchange for something else that is not worth the cost.

For this reason, for the last eight years, I have been solidly on the side of the unreasonable, against ignorant people who insist that Obama is “not that bad” or “better than a Republican would have been” or whatever. Obama, the guy who’s deported more immigrants, arrested more whistleblowers, ordered more assassinations, and expanded the surveillance state more than any President in our history.

I supported him for the same reason people now support Hillary Clinton, because I thought being conciliatory and trying to find common ground was a possibility in politics.

It’s not. You stake out a pole, far from the center, and you do your best to become a force of attraction so strong that you bend the stream of history in your direction.

I’m going to be in the streets for at least the next 4 years, and probably the rest of my life, in the face of people like those sneering Clinton supporters who think “protests don’t work” or “that’s not how change happens” or who think the way you get “them” on “our side” is being reasonable.

It would be incredibly ignorant of me to create a clean dividing line here. I know there are plenty of people who support Clinton who have also been in the streets reliably when it counts. I know there are plenty of people who voted for Sanders, or for the Green Party, or for whatever wacky, quixotic weirdo any of the minor left parties put up for President this year, who also think the only way to achieve change is through electing the right politicians.

It doesn’t matter who I ultimately vote for for President, because I live in the most liberal part of the most liberal state in the United States which, against all good sense, has solidly chosen Clinton for President every time we’ve had the chance. But there are a lot of people who live in the few places that really matter who are not inclined to vote at all, and if they are, will not be inclined to vote for Clinton, and who are going to be told to “be reasonable”, to “grow up” and realize the threat posed to Our Country by Donald Trump.

Some of those people are going to be the kind of people who’ve put their bodies on the line to stop immigration raids initiated by a Democratic president, or who put their bodies on the line to prevent more fossil fuels from being dug up or burned based on leases granted by a Democratic president, or put their bodies on the line for eviction defense during the housing crisis in the face of a Democratic president who refused to prosecute the bankers.

A lot of my friends have done a lot more of this work than I have, and are a lot braver than me in that regard. And every single one of them has reminded me at some point during this election season that the struggle is lifelong and continues no matter who is President.

What I see in my immediate future is a constant, pervasive version of people gingerly walking past the ongoing marathon struggle for social justice and calling the people engaged in it “unreasonable”, or worse. I see a dense thicket of think pieces about how selfish or privileged people who don’t feel any particular urgency about voting for Hillary Clinton must be. I see a lot more unfounded criticism of the entirely justified outpourings of rage we’ve seen against Trump and his supporters. And it all just makes me tired.

And even in writing this, I can imagine a few people, older than me, people who’ve been arrested a few times for fighting for what they believe in, thinking all those things and worse about me.

And I can already hear the plaintive cries of “yes, but we have to do both!”

Even if that’s true, voting is easy. Continuing to show up day after day, year after year, even when the arc of justice is being particularly stiff, is much harder.

That time I met a ghost or possibly just an old drunk in Georgetown, California

A few years ago I did a live storytelling open mic in Washington DC for a group that’s now called Story District. It’s a story about the time my friend and I got lost in the woods, nearly drove off a cliff, and then were aided by a mysterious, whimsical, and ultimately super depressing old man. Enjoy!

What I did in 2014

I had a lot of old friends asking after me in 2014 — it was a pretty tumultuous year that started with an epic trip across the country to make a documentary (coming soon!), saw me doing wacky stuff like running the Street Sheet and building an off-grid shipping container house in the middle of empty lot in West Oakland, and ended with a wave of riots that rolled like thunder through the entire Bay Area.

Since there are a lot of stories to tell, I made this video as a short catch-up. Hope you enjoy it.

Oakland’s new legal pot ordinance and what it means to give up white privilege

Oakland’s city council passed landmark legislation on Tuesday that, despite plenty of problems, is a solid first attempt at reparations for the War on Drugs.

Oaklanders who’ve been jailed for pot in the last ten years will go to the front of the line for legal weed permits under a revolutionary new program enacted by the City Council Tuesday night.

The first-in-the-nation idea promises to make international headlines, and redefine the terms of reparations in post-Drug War America.

Bringer of death, destroyer of worlds
Bringer of death, destroyer of worlds
It’s a bit much to talk about “post-Drug War America” while pot is still a schedule 1 drug (and really, take a moment to revel in how fact-free some statements on that linked page are) and dumb, violent, botched drug raids are still going on pretty regularly. But I digress.

The basic idea is to reserve some of the permits for legal pot businesses in Oakland for the people most heavily impacted by the war on drugs, especially black people. This is partly in response to lots of great reporting on how black people have been excluded from the booming legal pot indsutry.

The problem, as always, is capitalism. It takes capital to start a business, so absent any legislation, all the permits will end up going to people who already have access to it, e.g. white people. And the people who currently stand to benefit the most from the legal pot boom are Very Concerned about giving up the privilege that access to capital affords them:

Critics say handing out every other new permit to a tiny group of people will create a licensing bottleneck that will cripple Oakland’s vast expansion in licensed medical pot nurseries, farms, kitchens, stores, and testing labs. The Program was opposed by the majority of the city’s own Cannabis Regulatory Commission, who worked on the expansion for 18 months.

Critics of this program are right — this will slow down the expansion of legal pot in Oakland and create a really tight bottleneck. And that’s great, because the bottleneck is being created in exactly the right place. If there’s a big pool of capital trying to get a piece of the pot market, that capital is now going to have to find its way into the hands of people who suffered the most during prohibition. That’s a good thing. That’s not a real problem or a reason not to do this.

In the same way that medical marijuana is best understood as a back door to legalizing recreational pot, one way to think of this is a backdoor to cash reparations for institutional racism. Oakland’s city council probably can’t authorize cash payouts to black victims of the war on drugs, and in any case the city couldn’t afford it. But this is possibly even better than that. In this case, Oakland city council is staring down a bunch of wealthy people with piles of cash ready to invest in legal pot, and saying that at a bare minimum, they’re going to have to find someone who was recently incarcerated for pot and bribe them for their permit rights.

This is one small example of what it would look like to have an economic system that took history into account. It means some people lose out, and might not get to make as much money as they would have otherwise been able to. It means some people who are individually innocent, but who are recipients of unearned privilege, are going to have roadblocks placed in their way. And that’s a good thing — left unchecked, the legal pot industry will reproduce (in fact, is already reproducing) the same original sin of racism at the heart of all American capitalism. And this program obviously isn’t enough, but it’s a peek at a more just possible future, and that’s something to celebrate.